Judging by this article, it appears that the far left is finally catching on to the fact that former President Obama is not, and never was, a man of the people, but is rather a plutocrat in training. One thing lost, however, on the left is still the obvious question; why is Obama's presence so valued among plutocrats that he's getting all this bling, now that it's sort of legal for him to receive it?
I'm not a lawyer by trade, but it strikes me that when a judge in quite liberal San Francisco throws out 14 of 15 charges made in an indictment, one must consider the possibility that California Attorney General Xavier Becerra is not about justice, but about political retribution, and that maybe, just maybe, he ought to be removed not only from office, but also from the trade of law.
Interestingly, Ludwig von Mises has a concise response to the claim that we can obtain 100% of our electricity needs from renewable, non-biofuel sources; man acts. That is, human action can be independent of solar and wind patterns, and hence no matter how good solar, wind, and hydro power work, we can pull a trick and load down the system beyond what it is supplying. Hence we need some "on demand" systems and/or storage.
One would figure a guy smart enough to get a professorship at Stanford would figure this out, but apparently there's a lot of politics involved in getting an office in Palo Alto where ability in logic is not necessarily a requirement.
It's pretty obvious that Senator Bernie Sanders (CCCP-Vermont) doesn't remember the events for the few months prior to March 23, 2010 very well. If he did, he'd know full well about an important law about this very subject that was passed without a single vote from the minority party, and without their input, via the Constitutionally dubious tactic of reconciliation, and starting in the Senate despite imposing taxes/fees in clear violation of the 10th Amendment.
Alzheimer's is always so sad. Or maybe it's simply "politically expedient selective memory". You be the judge.
...for young people who are of the belief that they are "transgender"; here's the case of a young man who has run with the ladies despite having neither hormone therapy nor surgery. In other words, physically, if not mentally, he's all boy. And I've got to admit, I'm torn. On one hand, I don't want this young man's body chemistry to be ruined, or worse yet for his "factory parts" to be mutilated, and on the other hand, I don't want deserving girls to lose out because they have to run against the boys. I would have hoped that the prospect of being mutilated--forever, um, "cut off" from the possibilities of natural parenthood and such--would curb the possibility of this being done, but right now, I'm not so sure.
H/T Michelle Malkin. Apparently President Trump has just signed an executive order stopping federal work on resolving the issues with Y2K transition for computers. There are many things I do not like about Donald Trump, but let's give him credit when he gets it right.
A study commissioned by the Babylon Bee (Christian satire) "finds" that AC/DC's Highway to Hell is more sound, theologically speaking, than 96% of 800 Christian worship songs on the CCLI playlist typically performed on Sundays.
Now of course this is satire, but there is a grain of truth here; too many CCM songs are simply genre like "Jesus is my boyfriend", whereby the lyrics of modern love lust ** songs are slightly modified to speak of Christ, and sung as if they were Biblical. At least Bon Scott (who soon after he wrote that sing does appear to have gone to Hell, by the way) was honest enough to note that his life of rebellion to God would lead to eternity in Hell with those who partied with him.
So while I'm not ready to emulate Perry Noble and have my church play Scott's minimum nadir on Resurrection Day, I am ready to remind my "vast readership" that Christian music ought to have a distinctly Biblical message by which the Word of God may be conveyed to the people of God. Many thanks to the heavy metal bands of the world who, by using metaphors from Scripture, remind us of that.
** One side note here is that when I thought back about most of the "love songs" I've heard since childhood, they are overwhelmingly "lust songs" with lines that make clear that the song is, shall we say, about a relationship consummated prior to or outside of marriage. As such, they will tend to, shall we say, have lyrical and stylistic hints about that sort of relationship--hints not appropriate to Christian music, either before or after the Marriage Supper of the Lamb, to put it mildly.
To draw a picture, in London, you've got a population of about eight million in 1600 square kilometers--about 2000 square feet per person. Build four stories tall and have 90% of the land not covered by a building, and you've got 800 square feet per person--my share of both my home and office space. You would also have more green space than does a typical neighborhood in small town Minnesota.
In other words, while I think the private sector should be allowed to build that high if they like, there's simply no need for a building so tall that the fire department can't readily help. Central planners need to clue in to the fact that skyscrapers are monuments to vanity, not common sense.
Now I could be ticked about the recent (criminal) leaks that Robert Mueller's office is starting an investigation of obstruction of justice due to alleged interference with an investigation of non-crimes by the White House, and to a degree I am, but on the flip side, I know from 1998 that Democrats do NOT consider things like perjury and obstruction of justice to be crimes that rise to the level of impeachment and removal from office. Obviously, Mueller and his colleagues need to simply shut the investigation down, because no matter what, Donald Trump has not done nearly as much as his old friend Bill Clinton did.
Or if he continues, the case for draining the swamp in DC becomes ever stronger, which is I think closer to reality.
It's not been fun being a fan of Michigan State lately with the arrest of gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar, as well as the arrests and indictments of at least three football players for some degree of sexual assault as well. Obviously there have been some abominable problems there that need to be fixed.
That said, one interesting thing about this is that apparently, one coach was arrested for "interfering with investigations" when his apparent crime was....talking to the indicted players about the circumstances of that night. Also noted was the coach's failure to follow university policy led to his arrest.
In other words, it suggests that one thing in play may be that Title IX regulations requiring aggressive prosecution of sexual assault cases--to the point of abrogating Constitutional protections by using "preponderance of evidence" as a standard for guilt--may be affecting how local police prosecute obstruction of justice and interfering with investigations.
And writing as someone who has personally counseled victims of assault to talk to the police, I'm troubled. The ugly fact of the matter is that victims don't always know that what they've experienced is a criminal matter, and it takes a little bit of learning to get to the point where you are ready to tell them "you really ought to take this to the police--I'll go with you if you like."
So while it's entirely possible that this article understates what the gentleman is accused of doing, those who have the chance to help victims get to law enforcement ought to take note. It could be just at MSU, just at colleges, or it could be nationwide, but something very interesting is going on.
The Washington Post "fact-checks" President Trump's claim that "we built the Golden Gate Bridge in four years and the Hoover Dam in five" by admitting that yes, these projects were indeed built in that time frame, but because people had been planning it for years before, that the claim was false. In other words, they redefined President Trump's claim to declare the redefined claim false.
I award the Post seventeen Pinocchios for that one. Nice try.
Senator Elizabeth "Fauxcohontas" Warren, famous for lying about native American ancestry to get a plush position at Harvard and then the Senate, says that Attorney General Jeff Sessions ought to be fired because he didn't fully explain every contact he had with Russians in confirmation hearings.
Tell ya what, Fauxcohontas; when you give up YOUR ill-gotten gains, including your Senate seat and million dollar home in Cambridge, then we can discuss whether the Attorney General's statements in confirmation hearings were in fact lies, or whether Sessions was simply noting that in his position with Trump's campaign, he didn't have contacts with Russians.
There are certain phrases that will always get you into trouble if you're caucasian, even if you happen to be romantically involved with someone who is not. Most of us learn this by the time we graduate from high school, but apparently being liberal and rich makes one a bit slower on the uptake.
Speaking of slow on the uptake, notice how a lot of these sterling examples of class and decorum are linked to Al Franken. Somehow I'm not surprised 'ol Al has had to back away from his buddies.
Spend any significant amount of time around fundamentalists, especially of the Baptist variety, and you will hear quite a bit about the problems of "sensuality." More or less, as dear sister Elspeth notes in the comments of this post, anything that is particularly enjoyable to the human senses is described as "sensual" in the context of verses like Romans 13:13, 2 Corinthians 12:21, and the like.
Well, just for giggles (and perhaps edification), I went and took a look at the original Greek, and it turns out that Strong's #766 has its closest parallel in a Greek word meaning "brutal." A very interesting portion from Thayer's lexicon is there as well, indicating it may be a simple negative of the perceived character traits of a certain city in Pisidia, where citizens were renowned for strictness of morals.
Now in its context, and in its usage, it does tend to be used in the context of sexual immorality, but it appears, in my view, to denote specifically such cases where ordinary restraint is not practiced; that the behavior is no more human, but perhaps might be better described as "brutal".
In other words, it doesn't mean that anything that appeals to the senses is wrong. One can drink the wine Jesus made, eat wonderful foods from a Michelin-starred restaurant, take your wife dancing, make exuberant love to her as Paul commands in 1 Corinthians 7, and not fall afoul of Paul's command to avoid "sensuality." The problem comes, rather, when there is a lack of restraint that drinks to drunkenness, eats in gluttony, and exchanges pure marital love for fornication and adultery.
It strikes me that the word "sensuality" in the NASB is somewhat unfortunate, as it can, in our "low study" culture, give us the wrong idea of what is being described. Thankfully, God gave us experts in Greek, not to mention John 2:1-11, the Song of Songs, 1 Cor. 7, and the like to set us straight if we will listen.
The study described in this article purports to answer the question of whether red wine helps heart health by controlling for heart health. So apparently when we control for whether or not our control sample has arteriosclerosis, high blood pressure, myocardial infarction and the like, we find that both moderate drinkers and teetotalers have about the same rates of arteriosclerosis, high blood pressure, myocardial infarction, and the like.
Well, yes, and I could have told you that before you ever selected a sample or hired any statisticians. Scary thing is that this study made it past peer review, and even more scary, it's probably someone's Ph.D. dissertation that may land them in a professor's office.
....are amply shown in this "weight loss expert's" comment about imposing a "fat tax" on obese peoples' clothes. Apparently, this hypnotist has not only lost four stone due to hypnosis, but has also completely forgotten the experience of shopping at "big & tall" and "plus sizes" stores to realize that, due to the specialty nature of quality clothes for those of height and girth, plus the reality of extra fabric needed to cover the same, clothes for the obese are indeed more expensive than those for people of average size.
Either that, or he was one of those buying stretch pants at Wal-mart a size or two too small....
Again, regarding the tragedy where a "Greek" pledge at Penn State lost his life because nobody pulled out his cell phone and called 911, it strikes me that this is an understandable consequence of our Victorian** attitudes towards drinking. First of all, other fraternity members would know instinctively that since the pledges were largely under 21, that they would be in trouble as soon as the police and ambulance were called. This is especially the case when we consider that universities are prone to revoking fraternity charters when they get news of a party.
On a more basic level, the age 21 drinking age helped to kill this young man because it ensured that he learned about alcohol not from his family, but from his high school party friends and frat brothers.
Ending our Victorian attitudes towards liquor might not have kept him alive, but all in all, it would be more likely.
**I call these attitudes "Victorian" because Prohibition was a Victorian enterprise which the beer-drinking Puritans would have been puzzled by.
Writing as a guy who's actually done work ensuring the quality of plated parts of base metal like brass, beryllium copper, and stainless steel, what's worth noting here is that the military has been using parts with such platings for decades in all climates, and it does not matter whether they are dropped or "mishandled", as the IOC's excuse reads.
Rather, it simply matters that you've got a clean base metal blank treated properly and plated to a thickness of 50 microns or less. What matters is that your base metal and process is good, and it's worth noting that the weight of gold listed--0.2 ounces--is exactly the same as I'd anticipate from a 3" medal coated a little more than 50 microns thick.
In other words, their "environmentally sound" recovered base metal simply wasn't capable of holding any plating, something that should have been obvious to any decent plating engineer or technician. I dare suggest that a faulty medal is no environmental win. It's a triumph as great as that of the infamous green swimming pool.
Prompted by this note about a review of a book by Justin Peters,Do Not Hinder Them, I decided to purchase the book and see what Peters had to say. As I've mentioned "a time or two" on this site, the sad reality is that far too many "seeds" do not sprout, and it's something that's killing our churches.
The main thrust of the book, in my view, is Peters' view of the age of accountability--the doctrine that below a certain age, all children are given grace by God whether or not they personally confess Christ. In Peters' view, that age is somewhere around the ages of ten to twelve, somewhere near the age of a Bar Mitzvah, and where Dorothy Sayers noted the "poll parrot" stage of education ends, and the "pert" age begins. In the language of classical education, it's about the age when a child can begin to use the tools of logic/dialectic.
Now as a Baptist myself, I am of course quite amenable to the notion of an age of accountability. The simple fact is that infants do die occasionally, and that just as David noted that he would go to Bathsheba's child, there is some indication of grace to the child when he's that young. I can also commend the idea that there are some things the very young cannot really understand, and that the practice of thinking logically may be involved in coming to Christ.
And yet....and yet....I cannot completely go along with his thesis, as his very title refers to Matthew 19:13-15, which notes that Jesus specifically says to let the little children come to Him. Not teens, not youths, but little children.
Moreover, if a key issue with people falling away from Christ was age, then the Scripture might have said that specifically (it doesn't IMO), and we would not see the huge fallout from college age conversions that we do.
So it is a good effort, but ultimately it is one that does not persuade me. I am 100% in agreement that revivalism and its techniques bear a lot of false fruit. I am 100% in agreement that our "evangelism light" or "easy believism" culture tends to leave people defenseless against the challenges of life--persecution, the need to grow and repent, and the like. But at the same time, I am not persuaded that our problems will be solved as we refuse to immerse the young.
Leakers (of course) have revealed that apparently the FBI investigation of ties with Russia have identified people close to Donald Trump as "persons of interest." Now apart from whether you can trust a leaker, you've got the question of what happens to the effectiveness of the FBI when employees are giving the media a play by play account of investigations.
Given that almost all of these leaks are done on behalf of the Democrats, you've got to wonder if liberal "investigators" at the FBI would be just fine with every criminal in the world going free as long as the liberal narrative is preserved.
Check out this graphic (H/T ShotIntheDark.info) comparing how people viewed race relations in 2009 vs. 2016. Now granted, there was probably a bit of an "era of good feelings" with the start of the Obama presidency which probably influences the data, but it is still striking that the percentage of people who felt race relations were "good" halved, and the percentage of Americans who felt race relations were "bad" nearly tripled.
Keep in mind as well that this was before the election. This is taken at a time when most people believed that Hilliary Clinton would be the next President. You would have thought that we'd elected Bull Connor to the Presidency in November of 2008.
Here's a great column by George Will noting the economic malaise in certain industries known as "Baumol's Disease." More or less, it's where certain professions--teaching, medicine, performing arts--do not get more productive due to improved technologies. We might add "preaching" and "church work" to that as well--not too many pastors, after all, have audiences that exceed Jesus teaching the 4000 and the 5000, or even Peter's sermon to the infant church in Acts 2. Amplification, radio, the printing press, and even the Internet haven't really changed the dynamics that a man can really only serve so many people.
And perhaps--fundagelical churches having tried to adopt many factory techniques over the past century, often with dismal results (rear ends in pews, but the vast majority as spectators, not players)--it's time to stop striving against "Baumol's Disease", but rather to embrace it. Don't waste time and effort trying to overcome the limitations of the profession, but rather spend that same time and effort doing it the way Peter and our Lord did.
This entertaining little bit (H/T WND) suggests that by 2030, most Americans will no longer own a vehicle, and in the illustration they are suggesting that among the neutral factors are availability, comfort, and performance.
As if it makes no difference that my own vehicle is sitting in my own driveway, and I get to decide how clean it is, and what type of vehicle it is. It appears that these advocates of public transit, ride sharing, and autonomous vehicles have never ridden the bus or otherwise experienced "the tragedy of the commons."
Digging deeper, they are claiming that speed of travel, convenience, and safety are factors militating against AVs and transit....again, you've got to assume that they've never imagined their own vehicle sitting in front of their own home, and also (again) that they've never taken the city bus.
Transit, AVs, and the like have their place, but out of touch "studies" like this really don't do their cause any favors among people who have ridden the bus.
Apparently the Syrian government has not only been killing political opponents at an incredible rate for the past five years, but they may also have built a crematorium to hide the evidence. Data consistent with a crematorium include the general construction of the building and clear evidence of a lot of heat escaping from the building.
I'm looking forward to the Russian, Iranian, and Syrian explanations when Nikki Haley gets a hold of the pictures and shows them to the U.N. Apparently some people are a little slow on the uptake on what "never again" means.
Update: given that the U.N. World Intellectual Property Organization appears to be involved in granting the North Koreans a patent for sodium cyanide production, I'm not anticipating wonderful things from the U.N. It is, after all, the North Koreans who have supplied Syria with large amounts of chemical weapons, including this precursor to hydrogen cyanide, also known to the world as Zyklon B.
....regarding President Trump's rollback of Obama-era regulations requiring less salt, less fat, and more fruit, vegetables, and fiber in school lunches, and Mrs. Obama's rather angered response to the same. On one side, I agree wholeheartedly that we should not be happy with kids eating garbage, as Mrs. Obama notes, but on the flip side, I can't ignore the fact that if kids won't eat the Obama meals, then no good is being done--the kids are either sneaking in Snickers bars and French fries, or they're going hungry. Plus, doing things by administrative edict is appalling, Constitutionally speaking.
Really, as much of a fan of the Mayo Clinic Diet as I am, getting people to follow it is not as simple as passing new regulations. You've got to create real incentives to try it and stay on it, and Mrs. Obama's program simply did not do that in the same way that my first experiences with broiled chicken breast concluded with me thinking it'd been made by Goodyear.
Writing as the son of a woman who worked nearly 50 years in food service, there are simply some foods that don't work well on a steam table, and added sugar, fat, and salt are not there by accident. They do indeed enhance palatability, and hence if you're going to do healthy school lunches, the entire model--and capital spending--for the school lunch needs to change. It will quite frankly take a lot of new equipment, spices, training, and money.
Parents also need a different model for diet, starting with an end to subsidies for grains and dairy, and continuing to a better model than the Obama model for healthcare, starting with limited coverage for avoidable heart disease and diabetes. As I noted in my bit about the carbon fiber bicycle, delaying or avoiding that triple bypass (and the bill) could be just the thing for persuading a guy to try that salad.
My overall opinion is that it was long overdue, as Comey's handling of Hilliary Clinton's criminality simply does not pass muster for even a rookie detective. He convened no grand jury, issued no subpoenas, failed to get the hardware for months, allowed interviewees to share lawyers (allowing collaboration), allowed the destruction of evidence, and even swore those involved in the investigation to silence.
It strikes me that any competent President of either party would have let him go a long time ago, and the real scandal here is not that he was let go now. It is that he wasn't let go last July by President Obama, or....perhaps much earlier. Here is a link that details a bunch of FBI scandals....but contrary to the title, some of them are not on Comey's watch. Rather, former FBI chief Mueller and Eric Holder appear to have abused the private jets available to them, Mueller totally bobbled the cases of Nidal Hassan, the Tsarnaev brothers, and the NSA scandals.
If you look at the careers of Louis Freeh, Robert Mueller, and William Sessions, you're going to find any number of high profile cases where the FBI didn't exactly cover themselves in glory--missing evidence, destroyed evidence, doctored evidence, abuse of private jet privileges, and the like. In other words, the rot is deep in the FBI as elsewhere in DC, and getting rid of it is going to take some work. I just hope and pray that President Trump takes this responsibility seriously instead of once again sweeping things under the rug.
According to Fox News, it appears that members and pledges of Theta Beta Pi fraternity at Penn State University need a refresher course on the use of 911. If any happen to be reading this, here it is:
When you see a criminally or medically critical situation, such as an extremely intoxicated young person falling down the stairs and becoming unconscious, reach into your pocket, pull out your cell phone, and call 911. Do not wait for someone else to do it.
Related protocol; if someone demands you drink heavily as a condition of membership in their club, it's not a club worth joining.
Honestly, how many dozen people with a cell phone in their pocket refused to make that call? The degree to which people look past situations like this these days is just disheartening.
First, I got a call from my daughter yesterday: "Daddy, where is your blowtorch, and can I borrow it?" I'll be teaching her how to use it safely soon!
Next, regarding the furor of some "comedian's" comments about the President, lost is the principle that, ahem, a holster is where you put your gun when you aren't using it. So the word picture he was trying to draw....makes absolutely no sense. He succeeded in being vulgar, I guess.
I had thought that it was pretty pathetic that young ladies were paying extra to get their jeans pre-ripped, and while I was right, I didn't count on men wanting to join in the fun. Apparently now, Nordstrom is selling jeans that look like a real tradesman has worn them on a muddy day for only $425. H/T Powerline, Mike Rowe, etc..
If you can't afford that, but want the look and wear a 34/34 relaxed fit, I'll be willing to drag my jeans through the mud and give them to you for a mere $200. For an extra $25, I'll rip out the knees or something. Paint flecks will cost an extra $30. Proceeds will go to the Carbon Fiber Bicycles for Poor Engineers Who Like To Bake Fund, and are not tax deductible. Also available are ripped jeans and sweats in women's size 2, 4, 6, and 8 for the same price, and boys' ripped jeans and sweats from sizes 6-14 for a mere $100 apiece.
....it appears that Jim Harbaugh has some work to do yet with his team. How so? Well, they willingly compared themselves with gladiators--slaves forced to combat until they died--while in Rome. So apart from the real issues of how one squares a trip to Rome with the notion of "amateur" athletics", it appears that the spirit of general studies is sadly still quite alive at the U. of M. I have been hoping, despite my antipathy towards that school, that Harbaugh would lead something of an academic renaissance there and shame other football programs (like my beloved Spartans) into the same.
That said, maybe this trip will help in this regard. Time will tell.
Update: not going so well, as he's apparently been kicked out of a mall for throwing a football around. Maybe the coach needs to go back through western civ again, too. Update 2: Jim, you're in the eternal city. Maybe show some respect for where you are by wearing a hat that doesn't have a big block M on it?
The only bright side here is that the upcoming collapse of the Venezuelan economy leaves an opening for the U.S. and other nations to put conditions on help for the beleaguered nation. This is especially the case given that the main place Venezuelan oil can be refined is Texas. I'd suggest that a bare minimum of conditions would be (a) no economic assistance for Cuba, (b) return of foreign assets seized by the government, and (c) the ruling socialists step down with the provision that they never, ever, try to seize power again.
Acting on political correctness and a statistic suggesting 86% of women have sometimes lacked feminine hygiene products when they needed them, the University of Rochester in New York placed feminine hygiene products in both mens' and womens' bathrooms. The result is that they've learned the hard way that students are tremendous pranksters who would take a handful of the products just because they could, blowing through half the year's budget in a month.
This boggles the mind in many ways; that the advocates had no clue that this would happen, that they thought men might need these, that they thought they could meet the needs of all women with a limited array of products, and that they never clued in that by the time they reach college age, most women figure out that it's a good idea to have a couple whatevers tucked in their purses.
Or, for that matter, if a woman doesn't have this figured out, that maybe, just maybe, she's not college material. For that matter, maybe the advocates here aren't college material, either. Congratulations to this group for making a clear case for raising admissions standards.
Maybe not so much. Data from 2016 indicate that 16% of deployed women became pregnant on deployment. If we assume that only 10% of combat troops are women, we would infer that in a given year, about 1% of troops on a given ship would need to be de-deployed in a year. 20 years back, about 10% of the women on the "Love Boat" became pregnant, so it's a consistent problem.
This is close to the proportion of soldiers in a unit that General Patton said would die in a really terrible battle when he was preparing his men for Operation Overlord. Now we can argue all day (in a silly way, but we can) about how well qualified women are for combat positions in terms of physical and mental aptitudes, but the simple fact of the matter is that attrition of female soldiers and sailors due to pregnancy is similar to the effects of a major battle on units.
And really, it's no surprise. What's going on is simple; when you take young, healthy people ten thousand miles from home and put them in a situation where they are lonely and more than a little bit scared, they tend to fornicate. All the regs in the world can't stop that, but our regs ought to acknowledge it.
One final note; a West Point graduate of my acquaintance told me a few weeks back that when the Army tried to correlate success as an officer to the experience at USMA, the only thing that correlated well was how well the candidates did in their physical education classes. This stuff matters.
Apparently, former IRS crook Lois Lerner is afraid that if her role in IRS targeting of conservative organizations is made public, she will face death threats. Quite frankly, I agree that she might, and thus it's important to make sure that she is safe.
This can be done, of course, by putting her on trial for her obvious perjury to Congress and other crimes, and sending her to 1000 University Drive SW, Waseca MN 56093, where some personal friends of mine will work to ensure her safety.
You're welcome, Lois. Say "hi" to the guards for me.
...along with a glimpse of the abortion industry worldwide. First, in Sweden, a midwife has been told that she must do abortions if she wants to work, and that she must pay the cost for the government to sue her to do this. Worth noting here is that surgical abortions are, of course, a surgical procedure that ought to be done by a person trained in surgery. The person who objected to this requirement is a midwife not trained in surgery--not even an epidural, and certainly not a caesarean section.
So just like in the United States, abortion fees do not cover the costs of the procedure when done safely for the mother, and just like here, abortion advocates are willing to endanger women's lives by using unqualified persons to do the procedure.
Along similar lines, a judge in London has prohibited a family from taking their critically ill child to the United States at the request of hospital administrators in England's NHS. Key here is that it did not matter that the family had the money for treatment together; the death panel had spoken. The NHS monopoly can not tolerate the possibility that they might be proven wrong.
And unless they emigrate, they've got to get care from the same NHS that went to court to take all hope away for their child. I'd be filling out papers right now, I dare say.
Finally, regarding the question of whether mitochondrial depletion syndrome is incurable, well, there are some indications of hope. It's unlikely, to be sure, but we still care for people with ALS or "Lou Gehrig's Disease" despite the fact that we haven't found a cure for that, either. It's time for a death panel to put socialized medicine out of our misery.
The bald eagle. Going way out on a limb here, I've got to suggest that if the authors of the study actually believe that a 30' wall is going to impede the free movement of our nation's symbol, that might be a reason to cast their other conclusions into doubt, too. This is especially the case as the bald eagle is no longer an endangered species, and one might assume that there might be other reasons besides border walls that a species that eats a lot of fish might not thrive in the desert.
There can be great reasons not to support a border wall in the Sonoran desert--in many areas a simple vehicle barrier might be sufficient deterrent, for example--but the plight of the bald eagle is not among them.
How so? They admitted a kid who wrote "#BlackLivesMatter" 100 times in the essay portion of his application. Now no matter what your opinion on BLM--my view is you bet black lives matter, the question is how to protect them best--the point of an essay in a college application is not just to get a view of the child's "activism" or political points of view, but to get a view of their ability to write.
So what Stanford admissions has said with this is that it doesn't matter whether someone can write well, which ought to speak strongly to the quality of the education one might obtain there. Strongly, and negatively.
Why? Well, PepsiCo has given us a great reason with their recent, inexplicable ad featuring some woman who is the famous child of someone whose reason for fame occurred 40 years ago. Send hundreds of people to Bangkok to do an ad with a protest featuring clear references to Barry Soetoro, a cellist and a student inexplicably working during that protest, have famous child strut through it all and give a soft drink to highly attractive riot cop without riot gear. Watch as the left pops a gasket, as of course Black Lives Matter is the only group (s) allowed to have protests, or something like that.
Come to think of it, as I've got tendencies towards diabetes, and as this whole deal boggles the mind, maybe something from Bell's is more the ticket. Sad to say, I think Hopslam season is over for this year...
After the Heartland Institute distributed, apparently for free, 200,000 copies of a book called Why Climate Scientists Disagree About Global Warming, three senior House Democrats--Bobby Scott (VA), Raul Grijalva (AZ), and Eddie Johnson (TX) have filed a request that the book be destroyed, thereby indicating that their knowledge of the literary canon does not extend to Ray Bradbury.
One might also infer that Congressmen Scott, Grijalva, and Johnson have only a fleeting relationship with the practice of logic and the principles of investigation, which would have informed them that when you have a work with which you disagree, the last thing you ought to do is to demand it be destroyed. It is a "tell" that you are not just unwilling, but also incapable, of addressing its arguments.
First, it appears that a college degree will now be required to work in a daycare center in the District of Columbia. So apparently, a guy caught smoking crack with a prostitute is a safe bet for the mayor's office, but a person without a college degree can't be trusted to change diapers. Along with draconian regulations on homeschooling and firearm ownership, this is a great case for removing self-rule from the District. Common sense simply doesn't seem to be a prerequisite for being in government there.
Next, the state of Illinois has decided to punish straw purchases of firearms about as harshly as they do murder and rape. Now to be sure, a big portion of Chicago's horrific murder and assault rate is because straw purchases and the like were--apparently by the direction of former President Obama--not prosecuted.
However, the new law won't help things, because here the key problem is that for whatever reason, prosecuting straw purchasers wasn't going to fly in Chicago, and punishing straw purchases as harshly as murder isn't going to help. The simple reason is that when a punishment is deemed too harsh--like 8 years plus deportation for a green card holder voting illegally--it will not generally be imposed.
There are a lot of good things that can be done to curb Chicago's murder rate--community policing to regain trust, punishment of minor crimes with appropriate sentences, encouragement of traditional families, etc..--but I don't think this is one of them.
Believe it or not, you can do it even if you are a man by dressing well. According to Tammy Bruce, the editor of Conde Nast Traveler Magazine said this about the current trend of wearing "yoga pants" and/or leggings to all kinds of events:
Nothing makes you rethink your wardrobe choice like the embarrassment of shaking hands with five people in suits while you're wearing exercise pants.
Want to help your female friends look better and avoid "giving too much information"? Exchanging jeans for slacks, exercise shoes for work or dress shoes, or putting on a coat or tie might be just the ticket. And even if it doesn't help with that, your wife might like it.
It appears that the previous President was on the side of a territory that wanted to restrict the right to vote to people of the proper race. At the very least, his Department of Justice didn't think that prohibiting non-Chamorro residents of Guam from voting violated federal law, specifically the 15th Amendment.
But, given that Obama had earlier endorsed actions that would gut the 13th Amendment, I don't see why I should be surprised that he'd have gutted the 15th if he could have as well. Appalled, of course, but not surprised. I'm just thankful that our current President is one who is likely to honor the text and spirit of the 13th and 15th Amendments.
A young man's parents are suing because their son was required by his school to share locker rooms--and as a junior, this means showers too--with a biological female who, for reasons known to her, decided she was "male" enough to use the boys' locker room. Now of course, I don't know her motives, but I know that my response would have been (and would be today) about the same.
And along those lines, those who genuinely do suffer from this mental illness need to be treated compassionately as well--by not opening up the opposite sex's restrooms and locker rooms to them. Like it or not, this girl is mentally ill according to DSM-5, and it doesn't do her any good to be exposed to the catcalls of her peers calling her a "freak", "pervert", "slut", and the like. Never mind what happens to all participants when some boy's body does, or does not, respond to her exposed female form.
Isn't high school tough enough without this kind of silliness?
Recently, a transgender person named Laurel Hubbard won the "over 90kg" category for women's weightlifting at the Australian International with a total lift of 268kg, about 19kg greater than the runner up, but far short of the world record of 348kg set by Tatiana Kashirina of Kazakhstan--suspended in 2006 for failing doping tests.
Now what's interesting here is that Hubbard's advantage in weight--9kg above all other competitors--scales nicely with the advantage in terms of results--8% or so. In other words, having been born male does not seem to confer a disproportionate advantage vs. women in the sport.
How is that so? Well, it might have something to do with the fact that at least 137 weightlifters have been caught doping, which would in turn imply that the actual rate of doping is likely much higher, and would then imply that--like we learned during the scandal with Lance Armstrong--the sport is a sham at elite levels. The problem is not that sports federations are allowing the transgender to compete now, but rather that they've been allowing them to compete for half a century.
We have on the one side an active FBI investigation into whether the Russians were working with the Trump campaign to influence the election, and on the other hand we have James Comey saying he's unaware of any wiretaps of the Trump campaign. It strikes me that both of these contentions cannot be true in any meaningful way--one might object that there were not physical devices connected to phone systems in Trump Tower specifically, but if indeed Comey is correct that there is an investigation, the idea that there was no surveillance of the campaign is hard to believe.
As the good professor noted in The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe, it seems that schools, including fairly elite law schools, are simply not teaching logic anymore.
Yes, I know I'm being redundant here, but this story just floors me. Apparently, when lecturing in a legal ethics class, Neil Gorsuch may have pointed out that it can be seen as unethical for a motherhood-minded lawyer to obtain a job with maternity leave benefits for the sake of....maintaining income while growing her family, especially when she has significant student loans.
In response, a former law student claims that this somehow discounts the worth of women in the workforce....as if pointing to the cost of maternity leave is equivalent to saying women shouldn't work at all. The issue is compounded by a claim that Gorsuch pointed out that female lawyers have twice the divorce rate of male lawyers.
Now, on the planet I inhabit, warning people about the perils of their chosen profession--and I did quickly find a study from the ABA that said 50% more female lawyers were divorced than their male counterparts--would ordinarily be seen as a "service", not a "harm." Apparently, however, the sun shines a different color in the People's Republic of Boulder.
Graph out each agency's spending by month over the year, and set their next year's budget according to spending for the first ten months. Many agencies are notorious for "blowing" their budgets in the last month or two of the fiscal year to avoid cuts.
Fire the heads of those agencies with this pattern, and do not replace them.
....is that defunding Planned Parenthood Infanticide for a year will result in more births because women in poor areas do not have nearby clinics that are not affiliated with them. So just for giggles, I did a google search for medical clinics in Gary, Detroit, and Chicago, and amazingly, I found that within a few miles of any place in each city, there was a medical clinic not affiliated with Planned Parenthood. It is sad, but not surprising, that this five minute exercise was apparently beyond the ability of the Post reporters and editors, even apart from the notion that the money currently given to Planned Infanticide could be used as well to found clinics in underserved areas.
And, of course, even more shamefully, figuring this out is beyond the ability of the CBO. Is it too much to ask that our government do its work honestly? Apparently so.
Apparently, the state of New York is contemplating doing away with a literacy test for teachers because too many "minority" applicants are failing it. Now that's depressing enough--one would hope that any high school graduate, never mind a person with a bachelor's degree or more in education, would be able to pass such a test with flying colors--but it actually gets worse.
Overall, nearly 40% failed, and when the Manhattan Institute reviewed the test exam, their professional writer achieved only a 55% score and noted that several of the "multiple guess" questions appeared to have multiple correct answers, but only one would be scored as correct. This may explain why the exam did not predict (according to those with the data) success in the profession.
So what we have is a situation where the state board of education can't write a basic reading test, huge numbers of teachers may be dishonoring their almae matriae by not being able to read, larger numbers of teachers may be dishonoring their profession by not performing better than illiterate colleagues, and schools of education are acting as if the problem is primarily one of racial equity.
So for the sake of the great State of New York, here's a simple reading test; open a newspaper, read, and tell me what you just read. You're welcome.
Engineers at Google and Levi's have teamed together to create a jacket designed to allow cyclists to be connected with the world, but not staring at the screen on their phone. As such, they view it as a big safety advance--and then they promote it with a video of a cyclist without a helmet.
Hint; if it's cool enough to wear a jacket while cycling, it's not too hot to wear a helmet, and quite frankly I much prefer the thought of shattering a helmet to the thought of shattering my skull. So they take care of a third order safety issue while neglecting a first order one--did they actually talk to any cyclists before doing that video, or for that matter before they did the jacket?
They certainly didn't ask me--while the technology is cool, time on two wheels is generally "alone" time for me, and quite frankly the weather in Minnesota is too volatile to achieve connectivity with just one jacket. So it falls, as far as I'm concerned, into the bin of "solution in search of a problem."
Apparently in 2015, an entire container full of firearms from Sturm, Ruger, and Company was stolen by gang-bangers in Chicago. 111 firearms were stolen, some of which were of course used by Chicago's many gangs.
Now of course, the city and various community organizers therein are wondering why the railroads don't hire more security to prevent things like this, but it occurs to me that if the trains were moving, instead of parked at the railyards, then it would be far more difficult to rob them. Along these lines, a train that could go around the city in a few hours if the tracks were clear actually takes 27 hours on average to get around the city. That's a lot of time for the Vice Lords and Gangster Disciples to work.
But that said, 111 guns is a drop in the bucket in Chicago, and railroads are one of the few things going on the South Side, so maybe this isn't the big reason to change how trains go around the Windy City. Cutting of one's nose to spite one's face, as it were.
I heard Senator Al Franken talking about the confirmation hearings for Neil Gorsuch on WCCO today, and it was interesting (but infuriating) to hear his reasons for being against Gorsuch; more or less that the Supreme Court was, in his opinion, in favor of corporations instead of workers.
Now of course, this is interesting for starters because the Constitution says nothing whatsoever about the rights of corporations vs. those of workers, but rather provides that Congress can do things to ensure uniform rules for bankruptcy and interstate commerce. So Franken is for starters positing a role for the Supreme Court nowhere suggested in the Constitution. If he doesn't like federal law regarding corporations and trade unions, he has only himself to blame, really. He's also stating very clearly that he is all for judicial activism as long as his side is calling the shots in how the Constitution will be twisted.
But more importantly, notice as well that he's more or less trying to set the entrepreneurial class--the corporations or bourgeoisie if you will--against the working class or proletariat. In other words, Franken is for all practical purposes a Communist, something that he's been hinting at ever since he was the "Church Lady" "Stuart Smalley" (H/T Sue) on Saturday Night Live, and something he started shouting with his books. Long past time for Minnesotans to wake up to who our junior senator really is.
What strikes me about the recent Washington Post article claiming Jeff Sessions spoke with the Russian ambassador no less than twice prior to the election is that....ahem, isn't this someone leaking classified information? Isn't it a fact that people can and do die when intelligence officials leak this kind of thing?
It would be nice if the Post were as worked up about unauthorized release of classified information as a misstatement, possibly a lie, by Jeff Sessions about meeting with ambassadors--something that was, ahem, part of his job as part of the Armed Services Committee. It is also worth noting that if Senator Franken knew that Sessions had met with the ambassador, he was illegally in possession of classified information--he is not on a committee which requires a security clearance.
Yes, there are some criminals here that need to be prosecuted, specifically writers and editors at the Washington Post, along with their sources in the "deep state." But Jeff Sessions is not among them.
Now "protocol" says that one ought not belittle a fellow Senator, of course, and yes, people can forgive these wrongs, but I am quite happy to see someone objecting to a posthumous honor for Hayden for these reasons. There are times, quite frankly, when politicians get along too well, and that betrays that they really might not believe what they say they do.
The town of Overtornea in northern Sweden is considering giving its municipal employees a paid hour per week so they can go home and make love to their spouses. Now apart from logistical problems--what do you do for the single, and those whose spouses work during the day, how do you make sure they're doing what they're supposed to be doing (ewww), and what do you do with the kids--these municipal employees just might have trouble giving blood, or at least would get embarrassed quite a bit.
You see, since prostitution is strongly linked with AIDS, every donor is asked in a few different ways "have you ever taken or received money or drugs in exchange for sex?", and these people would have to answer yes--and then explain that the "john" was their town government.
When I first moved to Minnesota, one of the nicest things about shopping in Edina (cake eater territory) was that I could walk into a good men's clothing store and ask for "17 1/2 36-37 fitted" and not be laughed at. You paid for it, but you could get it--or they would know where you could. One of the places where you could get fitted suits of good quality was Marshall Field's, and I vividly remember walking into the men's area, and within five minutes the salesman had guessed my size (correctly) and found five suits that would meet my needs.
So what is going wrong now? Well, in my last visit to Macy's in Edina, what I noticed is that the guys who used to staff menswear are simply not there anymore, and when I looked at the garments they had, polyester blends were far more common than wool or cotton. Moreover, the old system of identifying garments by size had broken down--nobody cared to make sure that a 36 waist trouser was on a hanger identified as such.
In other words, the prices still said Marshall Field's, but the garment quality said J.C. Penney and the presentation said Goodwill. In other words, my view is that contrary to their CEO, the company does not need to "evolve" or "execute faster", but rather to remember the things that made them the nation's biggest and bring them back.
Granted, in a world of fast fashion and spandex garments, it's harder and harder to sell the old Marshall Field's experience, but at a certain point, that's precisely why you hire people in marketing, no? I certainlytry to domypart, and the differences in fit, wear, comfort/breathability, and such are not difficult to describe.
Or it might be that, now as then, most people wouldn't get it. Only two people got it back then, and my wife and I met at their wedding. I don't think that Capone cards had anything to do with that, though.
Recent reports indicate that recent decisions of retailers to drop "Trump" brand clothing, jewelry, and other lines had a lot to do with precipitous drops in business as the election season was gearing up--apparently about the same time "the Donald" wrapped up the nomination. Now granted, I don't have a good statistical sample of those customers who ultimately made that decision, but one would have to conclude that a significant portion of "soak the rich" Democrats were previously willing to buy Trump brand products.
Now from my perspective, I've found the Trump brand rather tacky ever since I was in high school, but it particularly boggles the mind to contemplate this crowd buying their merchandise in the first place. If one isn't careful, one is bound to learn something new each day, I guess.
When arrested for having a loaded pistol while flying, the aptly-named Rick Derringer noted that he'd flown over 50 times with such and never been stopped before. Sure makes me feel safer, but it sounds about right given the rate at which the TSA misses lethal weapons in FBI tests.
So while I don't condone his failure to read the signs while going through screening--his mistake is not exactly excusable or subtle--it does suggest that we might do well to try something new for airplane security. I wonder, for example, what portion of pilots are now certified to fly while armed? (the last data I could see indicated about 10% in 2008)
Having grown up near Chicago, and within 20 miles of at least 20 train lines in NW Indiana, I'm a huge fan of trains, but quite frankly the reality of train travel (a.k.a Amtrak) leaves a lot to be desired. And so I was intrigued by this article about "most romantic train rides", especially the picture in this link.
Notice what you have is the coal-fired (romantic?) steam locomotive pulling up a grade with....a modern diesel locomotive right behind it. In other words, they've got the romance and the reality. To buy the ride, people want both. And in this case, it's pretty obvious that they're compromising one to get the other.
The solution, if it's practical, is simply to have a small diesel and generator on each carriage--a "doodlebug" configuration--and then let the old steam locomotive be the "crumple zone" in the case of a crash. I'm told that the typical objection to a doodlebug configuration is, after all, the prospect of what happens in a crash with freight trains.
Oh, and maybe....just maybe....rework the steam engine to burn natural gas instead of coal. Maybe I'm just weird, but unfiltered coal smoke is not part of the old romance of rail, but is rather part of why so many of us decided to drive, take the bus, or fly.
Believing (wrongly) that the federal Department of Education has the power to destroy public education, many people on the left are planning to homeschool their children. The irony here is that since schools allocate funds by the number of students, and since schools really need a quorum of smart, well behaved kids to function well, these well-meaning but misguided liberals are...
.....exercising their power to destroy the public education available to their children. Oops.
But that said, if liberals learn how few resources (in money and time) are needed to educate a child well, and the tremendous freedoms offered by home education, all I can say is "the more the merrier." This is especially the case as it would further the migration of home education away from the teachings of guys like Bill Gothard, and would be tremendously good for the movement. It also has the possibility of reminding the left of the joys of traditional family life where one parent has primary care of the children, and of reminding Democratic legislators that homeschool freedoms cannot be infringed without extracting a political price.
I'd like to get one of those squarish pink hats--the ones named after a cat I'm told--and embroider "Justice for Juanita, Monica, Gennifer, Paula, Kathleeen, and a bunch of others" on it, and then see who gets the joke. Or maybe that would be a little bit more dangerous than it ought to be in a world of reality-and-humor-challenged activists.
Apparently, the rioters thugs fascists rioting at Berkeley on February 1 decided, among other things, to smash the windows of the Martin Luther King building on campus. February 1 is, of course, the start of Black History Month.
It strikes me that the major difference these guys have with the Ku Klux Klan is that they wore black instead of white hoods to cover their faces.
I may be reading between the lines a bit too much, but this case of a woman marrying the firefighter who accompanied her to the hospital after the Boston Marathon bombing makes me think the firefighter is not only a real man in many ways, but also a Monty Python fan.
Real man because he ran towards the explosion and helped save this lady's life, and then is marrying her, and a Monty Python fan because in the ambulance, he told her that her injury--which required the amputation of her leg above the knee--was only a "flesh wound".
And come to think of it, marrying an amputee counts as another point for being a real man. Best wishes to the happy couple!
To no one's surprise, President Trump's executive order curtailing the acceptance of new refugees has been assailed....falsely....by former President Obama. Now given Obama's popularity with the media, he's not to be trifled with, but it strikes me that a simple note from the new President might give him pause.
Noted your talking to the media.....and I remembered that I have it in my power to release the FBI staffers involved in the decision about whether to prosecute Hillary from their pledges of confidentiality, and depending on what we hear from them, we might decide to override Jim's decisions and see what Hillary has to say about the matter. Just sayin'.
Enjoy your retirement!
Yes, I'm writing about today's politics, again, like Mario Puzo. I don't like it, but if that's the game that must be played....
It turns out that the limo torched by anti-Trump protesters was owned by a Muslim immigrant, and the driver they assaulted while ruining his livelihood had an identifiably Hispanic name. With friends on the far left, it would seem that Hispanics, Muslims, and immigrants don't need any enemies, do they?
In related news, Minnesota legislators are looking to increase the penalties for rioting, and while I sympathize with the motivation, it strikes me that the biggest problem we have with rioters is not that the penalties we have are not harsh enough. It is that police departments and prosecutors are refusing to prosecute rioters and impose the penalties we have. We seem to be forgetting that if a penalty is seen as unduly harsh, prosecutors, police, judges, and juries will refuse to implement it. A parallel case is some wisdom a friend gave about the landlord business; don't make the penalty for late payment so high you can't bring yourself to impose it.
Powerline tells us that there is, apparently, an entire journal devoted to "Metal Music Studies", and that a key question to be addressed is whether a musical genre where most performers have long curly hair with pancake makeup and have physiques developed by years of bench-pressing tuna salad sandwiches and heroin suffers from a crisis of hypermasculinity. Worth noting as well is that a patron saint of hair metal, Mutt Lange, is the same guy who also did production work for Bryan Adams, Huey Lewis, Lady Gaga, and of course his ex-wife Shania Twain.
Back when I was a young pup, a friend of mine scored a great opportunity--as a guy who was able to run close to 15 minutes for 5k, he got a full ride, including the possibility of five years and summers, at Purdue. As a decent student, it struck me that in that amount of time, I could get not only a bachelor's degree, but also a master's, without spending one red cent.
Sadly, it didn't work out that way for my friend--he partied his way out of college, much to my dismay--but it's good to see that a number of players from the University of Michigan are taking good advantage of their chance by graduating in four years. Time will tell, of course, whether this is simply a few smart football players, or whether Michigan's second-best Big Ten university (and 14th best Big Ten university overall) is going to end its shameful practice of giving many football players, especially minorities, Cadillac tastes on a Chevy budget by allowing them to maintain eligibility on their "general studies" program, but this is a good start for Harbaugh.
Apparently, one of President Obama's final acts in office is to commute the sentence of Bradley "Chelsea" Manning, duly convicted of disclosing close to a million classified and sensitive documents to WikiLeaks. Now as much as this is cruel to the country--telling people that it does not indeed matter whether one keeps private information private--it is simultaneously cruel to Mr. Manning, who is said to have attempted suicide twice in 2016 and is on suicide watch at Leavenworth.
How is it cruel to Mr. Manning? Simple; outside of Leavenworth, he will no longer be on suicide watch, and will not be eligible for medical benefits through the VA--this is part of a dishonorable discharge that was part of his sentence. He will also have a tough time finding work as a result. In other words, in commuting Manning's 35 year prison term, President Obama may well have given him a death sentence. I hope I'm wrong for his sake, but this is where the evidence points.
Now apart from the fact that a list of "Presidential Medal of Freedom" winners reveals that it's pretty much a popularity contest, and apart from the fact that Biden and Obama really don't have that much to crow about except for the Health Insurance Deform Act and the 1994 crime bill that gave Congress to the GOP, Proverbs 27:2 quite frankly comes to mind--let someone else praise you, and not your own mouth.
The craziest thing, of course, is that praise from "people that matter" in the media, Hollywood, international leaders and bodies, and the Democratic Party has belonged to Obama and Biden in spades. Would we argue that the "Distinguished Service Award" ranks up there with his Nobel?
So what we have here, really, is a couple of men with a pathological need for affirmation--more or less what the Mayo Clinic calls "narcissistic personality disorder."
....I saw in the paper that going from 77F to 20F reduces, on average, the fuel efficiency of standard vehicles by about 12%, but hybrid car fuel efficiency drops by about 34%. The reason for this is simple; you cannot get as much current out of a cold battery as you can from a warm one, which is also why it's always cold when your battery fails This means, of course, that the Prius that passed me going about 80mph on a 10F day was getting not about 40mpg, but rather about 25mpg.
Which is about what the Buick Regal I was loaned a couple of months back got in similar conditions, just without the fun of 265hp or any sense of "style". In other words, hybrids and electric cars really make no sense north of the Mason-Dixon line at all, and they really ought to have a "winter" rating for mileage and range to go along with the summer ratings.
....to John Birch Society founder Robert Welch and Senator Joe McCarthy comes from an unlikely source, Noel Riley Fitch's biography of Julia Child, Appetite for Life. Now I read the book first of all because it was my mother's, and second of all because it's interesting to learn how a former intelligence agent became the queen of high end cooking in this country, and what made her tick.
And in reality, that's the most interesting part of the book. We learn that she, like her family, was not particularly big on church (she walked away altogether after college), that she was active in the repeal of Prohibition (and knew the local speakeasies well), and that she was politically liberal to the point of offering the same defenses for abortion that you'll hear today, including the argument that a syphilitic prostitute is a typical mother seeking an abortion.
But that aside, we also learn a lot about today's intelligence services and the State Department from her experience in India and China. Fitch (Child) presents a picture of an OSS with quite a bit of wild parties and promiscuity, and also one where those involved generally had a far more positive view of Mao than of Kai-shek, even to the point of not knowing or caring that Mao was getting supplies and guidance from the Soviet Union.
A key passage for me--and I am not a Bircher--was in Fitch's (Child's, presumably) view of the death of John Birch. Fitch (Child) describes him incorrectly as "the son of" fundamentalist Baptist missionaries in China--his parents were in fact Presbyterian missionaries in India, and he was the Baptist missionary in China. Moreover, his death is described as due to arguing with Communists--but they were theoretically allies at the time. Hence, the fact that Birch died was indeed (per Welch and McCarthy) that the Communists were not really our allies, but an opponent that happened to have the same enemy for a while.
In other words, Fitch (and Child) show why Welch founded the JBS, and why Joe McCarthy launched his investigations of the State Department and other institutions; the pattern of missing obvious information was too obvious to consider random. Come to think of it, as one of our 17 intelligence services seems to have fallen hook, line, and sinker for nonsense allegations against Donald Trump, we might guess that the exact same dynamic is at work today as was working in the OSS in 1943. It is, once again, time to take a serious look at the culture of our intelligence and diplomatic agencies, and see what's blinding them.
In the news recently has been the behavior of Meryl Streep, who rightly castigated Donald Trump for mocking a disabled reporter, but then proceeded to applaud a lifetime achievement award for Roman Polanski, who has admitted what was more or less a forcible rape of a 13 year old, and has paid hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions, in compensation to her.
Now we could attribute this to the same moral blindness that leads most of Hollywood to love another rapist, Bill Clinton, or we could take a good look at the Hollywood tradition of the "casting couch." It is, apparently, well known in the industry that a certain proportion of movie producers and directors use the desire for good parts to obtain sexual favors, and I remember reading that no less than Marilyn Monroe reported this use of the casting couch, and of course Tippi Hedgren recently reported the same of no less than Alfred Hitchcock.
Whether or not Ms. Streep has been a victim of this practice (I personally doubt it), it is nearly certain that she knows of a number of directors, producers, and studio executives who have taken advantage of it, and just as certainly Polanski has the goods on any number of his colleagues if a suitable number of them turn on him.
In other words, code of omerta or mutual assured destruction may well be getting Polanski awards. I have previously resisted the thoughts of conspiracy, but in this case, I've got to wonder if more is going on than "my tribe/your tribe" hypocrisy.
In a recent homeschooling newsletter, a supposed "expert" on music was arguing that the "back beat" or "offbeat" in music was wrong because of the sound of the heart. Well, let's take a listen. As someone familiar with the cardiac cycle would infer--the ventricles beat after the smaller, weaker atria--the actual heart beat is, ahem, offbeat.