Having been led to the Savior by a history teacher and a linguist while in college, I am a sucker for well written history and etamology. One thing I've noticed lately is that actual historical documents demonstrate that there is a clear limit about how far the knowledge of logic and rhetoric can carry a man.
To wit, I read last night that during the First World War, people actually claimed that they were making war on Germany because if Germany were defeated, there would be little new impetus to start wars. The uncomfortable fact that nations had fought wars for millenia before there was a nation called "Germany" somehow escaped them, as well as the fact that they were also waging war. And of course, these were university graduates trained in the classics--they didn't have an excuse for sloppy thinking like too many of us to today.
In other words, the liberal arts only help those who are willing to be helped. I hope to train my children in them, but thanks to the study of history (part of Plato's dialectic phase), I do know its limitations.
Could McMullin win Utah? - Source Comment: probably little chance of impacting overall Presidential campaign but interesting
41 minutes ago