Press Secretary Gibbs accuses former Vice President Dick Cheney of misrepresenting the facts, but does not challenge a single statement specifically. Now he had the press conference exactly why?
That's right; he knew, sad to say, that most of the press was either unable or unwilling to call him on the fact that he didn't actually provide any evidence for his position. The only question about the Obama White House is what to call it. Potemkin Village? All hat and no cattle?
If you want No Kings...
-
but you love Big Brother, you're fucking useless.
If the people who show up in St. Paul today boo Tim Walz and Keith Ellison
off the stage, I'll respect ...
1 day ago
2 comments:
I'm not so sure about what to think of this...torture is not my think, but sometimes it's required to get the answers from the Enemy.
I'm ambivalent on the "interrogation methods" issue, too. I'm not ambivalent, however, about the series of lies and legal offenses committed by Holder, Gibbs, and Obama in re-opening a CIA probe that had already been completed, and that Obama and Holder had repeatedly promised would never happen.
Good luck keeping good people in the CIA--and finding out what terrorists are doing before they do it--when you hang an axe like that over everyone's neck.
Post a Comment