Or any drug, for that matter? It turns out, according to the Wall Street Journal, that the FDA does not require the publication of inconclusive or negative clinical trials of prescription drugs.
Pardon me, but aren't we paying for the FDA's expenses, and aren't we the ones who suffer when ineffective drugs are approved because adverse statistical results are removed from the analysis?
As I'm told Benjamin Disraeli once said, "Lies, damned lies, and statistics." Shame on the FDA for proving this once again.
A final note; one drug maker that DOES release (at least in meta-analysis form) its negative and inconclusive results is Eli Lilly. You don't always have the choice of their products vs. others, but when you do, you have another reason to consider them.
Benster and D Pick Your Games---The Super Bowl That Could Have Cost Kwesi
Edition
-
Sam Darnold has proved that last season was no fluke. As it turns out,
letting Sam Darnold walk is the worst decision a team has made with a
quarterback si...
4 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment