Evidently, the GOP vice presidential nominee is in some trouble because she evidently was involved in library censorship. Except for the little fact, of course, that she didn't do anything of the sort.
But let's imagine that there was indeed something in the Wasilla Public Libraries that was, at least in the mind of Wasilla residents, objectionable. Do sensible people truly believe that these taxpayers ought to be on the hook for putting filth into their own communities? Do we really believe that the mayor and the city council--or the taxpayers--have no right to critique what kind of literature is to be found in their local libraries?
It is as if librarians and the ACLU truly believe that the 1st Amendment somehow protects not only the freedom of the press, but also requires towns and cities to pay taxes to put anything and everything into their library if the librarian says so. Judith Reisman puts it well; this dustup is not about liberty or democracy, but rather about the desire of unaccountable elites to control the flow of information.
Lee v. Tam: Why "The Slants" trademark dispute matters - Supreme Court To Hear The Slants' Trademark Case This Week Excerpt: The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments this week for a trademark dispute ...
9 hours ago