An incredibly stupid idea

Actually, "incredibly stupid" doesn't even begin to describe this one. Apparently, feminists have come to the conclusion that mothers aren't rejoining the "work force" and leaving their children in daycare enough. Hence, Harvard Professor Alberto Alessina and U. of Bologna Professor Andrea Ichino suggest that the way to "fix" this problem is to tax women's income at a lower rate than men's.

One hardly knows where to start in ridiculing this idea. One would figure that Italians (with the lowest birth rate in Europe) might know something about what happens when a nation encourages women to ignore their maternal instincts. One might also figure that they might be aware of their proposal's likely influence in breastfeeding, daycare, and institutional schooling--and that these effects are all negative. One might also figure that they'd be able to hazard a guess about what the effects of this idea would be on marriage--more or less making a husband less valuable to the wife.

And no, this Hahvid prof isn't alone; witness this column by Linda Hirshman, nicely mocked here. To Hirshman's credit, she doesn't propose differing tax rates for men and women, but she still has the idea that a woman should disregard her maternal instincts and get back on that career ladder.

Methinks gender feminists like Hirshman and Alessina need to remember Wallace's words:

"The hand that rocks the cradle, is the hand that rules the world."

What a shame that feminists are so eager to cast away the God-ordained influence of women in return for a cubicle.

Missing the point

Apparently, the Anglicans have their first female "arch-deacon", and I'd guess also are announcing their lack of facility with the Greek language, even apart from Paul's admonition that a deacon must be a "one woman man." How one becomes a "high servant" (literal translation) is beyond me, and the parallels between this and the Water Buffalo Lodge and the Grand Poo-Bah are stunning.

Or maybe it's a little bit of shift from 1 Timothy that's required to accomodate the redefinition of "overseer" (episcopos, pastor/teacher/elder) as "Senior Top Management Vice President" (a real title in my company, sigh).

On another note, I hope all of y'all remembered that "every day is Earth Day." I celebrated this by cutting down two more trees and using their wood to burn out a stump.

Something bothers me...

...about all of the encouragement of debt in "conservative" circles. On the radio, you'll hear ad after ad for mortgages, debt consolidation, and debt elimination. In politics, you'll hear the argument that if a "public good" is to be used over many years, then it should be paid for over many years.

While I understand the logic, I'm brought back to Romans 13:8 ("Owe no man any thing, but to love one another.."), the principles of rent and capital, and the principle of not presuming upon the future (James).

In other words, is it really more cost-effective in general to pay principal plus interest, or principal alone? Is it really better to presume on the bird in the bush, or eat the one that's in your hand?

While certainly not all debt is bad or wrong, I think that believers ought to be a little more circumspect in its use than one might infer by listening to conservative talk radio.

Are they arguing theology, work, or money?

1 Timothy 6:1-10 is a passage that brilliantly illustrates the problems that ensue when most Bible translations choose to add headings to passages. Yes, they're useful to find certain texts, but there is a risk; that you lose the context because you read the headings. Ouch.

But to the passage, it's fascinating to see where the context leads. It starts, more or less, with "work hard for your master, especially if he's a believer," and then progresses to note that those who reject this teaching are (often) those arguing over minor issues, and simultaneously approaching Godliness as a means of (financial) gain. It then warns that those who love money will pierce themselves with many griefs.

Now think about the arguments you've seen in many places. Ask yourselves if they're really arguing theology, or whether they're hoping for financial (or other) gain somehow, or whether they're covering for the fact that they've been an unfaithful servant.

I don't know about you, but it's a sobering thought to me.

A brave young lady

WND (and Lifesite and HSLDA) reports that Melissa Busekros, a German child removed from her family for the "crime" of being taught Latin and math at home, has celebrated her 16th birthday (and better legal status in Germany) by running away from court-imposed foster care to return to her family. Pray that the German authorities will stop bothering this poor family and repeal the Hitler-era law against home education.

Happy (late) birthday, Melissa!

(and thanks for the correction, Mark)

Environmentalism

Hope that everyone had a good "Earth Day." My family celebrated by cutting down a tree and cooking dinner over its wood--we called our guests to the table with a CFC air horn as well. Count me dubious about the idea that something as heavy as octane will tend to get up into the upper atmosphere. I vividly remember how some "Boy Scout water" (gasoline) I used to ignite a pile of brush burned on a hot summer day; flames around my ankles (glad I was wearing jeans). Heavy gases tend to stay low.

That said, I was thinking this morning about the various ways environmentalism is manifested. Now I'm not opposed to using less energy and having a cleaner lifestyle. I don't believe, however, that current environmentalism--in particular the Hollywood variety--has the answers we really want.

To wit, I remember that in the 1970s, "environmentalism" often meant "deathtrap car" (remember those Civics and Novas?) or "malaria" due to the end of DDT use. In the 1980s and 1990s, it meant "unemployment" via EPA edict (still does for that matter) and "heat stroke" due to the CFC ban.

Today, it apparently means not only deathtrap cars, heat stroke, and malaria, but also "cholera." No kidding. Apparantly, the apogee of Hollyweird environmentalism is to eschew the use of ordinary amounts of toilet paper, and sometimes even the "water closet" itself. In short, they're eschewing the lessons given to Moses 3500 years ago about keeping one's excretions separate from one's living quarters and person.

Call me weird, but I'll take Moses' definition of environmentalism over Sheryl Crow's any day.

What to do?

One thing that is aboundantly clear after the Virginia Tech tragedies is that anti-gun people aren't going to figure out that carry permit holders pose little threat to others any time soon, and hence all of us are going to have to figure out what to do when we must enter a "Welcome Criminals" ("gun-free") zone like a school, a post office, or perhaps even your place of work or worship.

So what do we do to avoid becoming a victim--or having someone we love become a victim? Well, for starters, we can start paying attention to the signs. Judith Reisman points out, for example, that the VT murderer was known for taking inappropriate pictures during classes. I won't repeat the details here, but such behavior would have gotten people expelled 40 years ago. It's also probable that his writing would have gotten failing grades in a gentler age as well.

I don't guarantee it will work, but maybe a few letters to the dean about tolerating such things might wake someone up. But maybe not.

If not, or even if so, two basic options come to mind. First, get a carry permit (my birthday present was to apply!) and if you end up injured or worse in a "welcome criminals" zone, you or your estate can sue. Second, get those you love a canister of pepper spray, available at most camping goods stores. A man doesn't often hit what he cannot see.

Overall, just remember that if a man comes into the room, guns-a-blazing, you don't need to ask permission to fight back.

One wonders what to say...

...about the tragedy this week in Virginia, and along comes someone who captures the idea pretty well, IMO. Yes, there are those who will tell us that with the proper, "professional" psychological screening and so on, we might have been able to prevent the tragedy, or something like that.

Reality is, though, that there are any number of tormented loners who are appalled at their richer classmates driving expensive cars, drinking to excess, and sleeping around. There are any number of people you'll find who are appalled at American culture, and using a psychological profile to find and "treat" them will achieve only one thing.

You'll empty the honors dorms of every college in the nation, and you'll empty research labs from coast to coast.

Dreher suggests a better way called "friendship." Paul told us that it's the most excellent way, and maybe we should try it.

MOBster in high places.

Apparently, Chad the Elder from FratersLibertas has gotten himself a starring role in Mary Katherine Ham's latest video. Check it out!

Congratulations, Chad, but that last scene had to hurt.

Meat.

As the patriarch of a good-sized family (baby #5 due in May), I try to do my best to keep grocery and other bills in check, and one thing I've done is to start preferring chicken to beef. At 79 cents per pound for leg quarters, it seems a lot cheaper than chuck roast at $2.99 per pound.

Then something interesting happened. My family had another good-sized family over for dinner, and about 3 lbs of Italian beef fed all of us with leftovers. In contrast, it takes about 4-5 lbs of chicken to feed my family for one meal. Relative cost: about $4/meal for my family for chicken, and about $4/meal for my family for beef.

In other words, it's not just the cost per pound, but the cost to fill up a family. Since I prefer beef, here's the recipe:

3 lbs chuck roast
3 cloves garlic
1 tsp salt
1 tsp basil
1 tsp mustard powder (or use Italian dressing powder mix for salt, basil, and mustard)
6 pepperoncini

Cut roast into 2" cubes and place into dutch oven, cover & cook at 250F for 4-6 hours. Add pepperoncini (or jalapenos if you're adventurous) and cook another hour or two until meat can be shredded with a fork. Serve over a nice French loaf, preferably whole wheat, with side salad.

And a second recipe for decent, low-cost steaks. A local grocery store has sirloin tip roasts for $2.79/lb, and if you wet-age them for a week, you'll hardly know that you're eating an inexpensive cut. (warning; dry-aging will dry this cut out) Basic recipe courtesy of Ruth's Chris Steak House: cut roast into steaks of desired thickness, salt, pepper, and parsley to taste. Cook quickly over high heat in a cast iron skillet, or on a grill over charcoal or hardwood fire.

One final note; if you're trying to control or lose weight, think about how much of a particular meat it takes before you're satisfied. You might find that the "low fat alternatives" are a great way to, um, "bulk up" in the wrong way.

Imus, Starbucks, synagogues and churches

On Imus' idiotic remarks; time was when people would shrug off racist remarks as the sign of a small man, but respond with violence to the suggestion that a young lady they cared for (e.g. girlfriend, wife, daughter, sister) was immoral. Why are their fathers and brothers allowing clowns like Sharpton to do the talking?

(sadly, maybe because too many of them aren't in the picture, and too many of those that are are listening to this kind of degradation in rap music?)

And here's an interesting article that compares "the way Starbucks used to be" versus today, and draws conclusions about how a synagogue ought to appear to its visitors. I dare suggest that there are some implications for our churches.

A practical joke on American culture

H/T Cafe Glover. Thanks, sister!

Evidently, Joshua Bell, a world-renowned violinist, and the Washington Post decided to try an experiment. Bell would don the attire and demeanor of a street musician and play for 45 minutes in the L'Enfant subway station in Washington, DC. On a 1713 Stradivarius. He would see who would stop to listen, and see how much money landed in his case.

$32.17.

I can hardly think of a better comment on our culture.

You can't make this up, either.

Apparently, a group working to stop binge drinking is making the argument that if a one cent tax is imposed on a glass of beer in North Dakota, binge drinking can be more or less stopped. Yup, increase a ninety-nine cent glass of beer to a dollar, and all of those drunks will go home and play pinochle with their Aunt Mabel.

Or maybe the student activists have been smoking something pretty good to come up with logic like that.

Another thought on Circuit City

I usually don't keep anonymous comments, but one I received on an earlier post illustrates quite well why Circuit City ought to be evaluating the contracts of their executives:

"lets be brief....inspire to do well.negotiate contracts with unions(we are fighting for your future),climb the work ladder and progress within the company?who's idea is it to do these things?.wonder how much bonus the ceo is getting this year?.I am involved in such a class action myself. This is telling the workforce of America.it don't pay to be a team player and be rewarded for your service in the workforce. It don't pay to climb the ladder.or to improve the company your working for....your reward???...you've improved us tooooo much.now you are overpaid???.over paid??.what is that these days in middle class America where most still are just above poverty level"

Now, as tempting as it might be to dismiss this as uninformed economic paranoia, I think capitalists ignore it at their peril. The ugly fact here is that Circuit City executives have stolen a page from Sunbeam's "Chainsaw Al" Dunlap in open, merciless cost-cutting, apparently without taking into account the offense that would be taken.

In other words, they don't understand their customers, and this goes a long way to explain why Circuit City is getting their clocks cleaned (the VCR ones that blink because we don't know how to program them) by Best Buy and Walmart.

Preach a real sermon!

...by loving your kids, especially inasmuch as your parenting is what George Barna would call "revolutionary."

What is that? It means to take God's words in the Bible at face value. When parents do this, their children learn to do the same. Hat tip to SharperIron for the link.

Now note; one doesn't need to be perfect, be a skilled teacher, or whatever to be a great "preacher" in this way. One needs to read, understand, and apply the perspicuous Bible.