Courtesy of Lew Rockwell, it's a great summary of the basic ethical problems with the current "majority hypothesis" of climatology. In a nutshell, the data are cherry picked, and when someone wants to take a look at how, they get a stiff arm.
In a court of law--at least if it's not in California--any good lawyer would pounce on that like a Rottweiler on a T bone. Unfortunately, the media have largely forgotten how to think, and hence the majority hypothesis is protected.
Odds & Ends: April 17, 2025
-
Pandora. This was my music player of choice when it launched in the late
2000s. Like a lot of people, I slowly migrated to Spotify and forgot about
it. I...
18 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment