Former Trump staffer Omarosa is ready to testify at Trump's impeachment trial any time, any place, according to this article. Just one thing appears to be missing, however; evidence of impeachable offenses. Omarosa says she has some and is "cooperating" with Robert Mueller, but if it's as obvious as she wants us to believe, exactly why hasn't Mueller indicted anyone yet? Omarosa, in praising Michael Cohen, also glosses over the very real crimes of tax evasion and the like he could have been convicted for.
Seems to me her most recent interview is as fact-filled as her recent book.
Berg’s 18th Law: It’s Not Just For Spree Violence!
-
Entire Twin Cities media and left (ptr) last week: “A graduate student,
one of America’s best and brightest, was snatched away in the middle of the
night ...
3 hours ago
2 comments:
Why ever got involved with that nut case woman is beyond me. As embarrassed as I should be to admit this, but I actually watched 'The Apprentice' when she was on it. He shouldn't have reached back for her.
But then again, they may be kindred spirits.
Maybe.
The thing that baffles me is why the media don't see through this. If indeed she's provided actionable evidence, where is the action? Does nobody in the media see through this kind of thing anymore?
Post a Comment