Take a look here at a series by Canada's National Post. A series of scientists involved in global warming research are more or less demonstrating that there is more than one way to approach the evidence, and more significantly IMO, that those who advocate the "standard" interpretation of the evidence respond to their opponents not with evidence, but rather with ad hominem attacks, withholding of research grants, and deliberate falsification of the evidence.
I don't object to the idea that it would be smart to reduce fossil fuel use. I did, after all, live in LA for two summers, and I could tell when the smog days were simply by how well I could breathe. I do, however, object to the idea that government somehow has the right to tell us exactly how we can, and cannot, use energy.
Podcast #1,109: The Hidden Power of Heat — How a Good Sweat Heals Your Body
and Mind
-
Cold exposure has gotten a lot of attention the past few years, with
people dunking themselves in ice baths for the sake of their health and
well-being...
11 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment