The usual hypothesis for the destruction of a portion of the bridge to Crimea is that Ukraine had something to do with it, but upon looking at the evidence, I'm not so sure. For starters, a truck bomb being driven by those who wished to destroy things is not the general pattern of non-Islamic militants. To continue, the truck was westbound and came from Russia, was in the right lane (the worst lane to cause damage to the bridges), and the damage was to the road rather than the vital rail line for the most part. Moreover, the truck was far enough away from other vehicles that only three people were killed, and with little time to investigate, the Kremlin has announced they know who the suspects are.
Going further, the "retaliatory" cruise missile strike launched 84 cruise missiles, many of them at residential areas and even embassies, but so far only ten people have been killed, and Ukraine reports that they learned of the attacks being planned on October 2 & 3. Preparation for attacks would seem to give us some hint of why so few people were killed.
I can't absolutely prove it, but this looks like classic Kremlin misdirection and misinformation to justify a new series of war crimes. If it were a Ukrainian act instead of a Russian, the truck would have been eastbound, would have been near a Russian troop transport when it detonated (if possible) , and would have been aimed to take out the rail line, too.
Evidence suggests that the FSB (KGB) did this and murdered three innocents in the process, followed by the murders of other innocents in the pre-planned cruise missile strikes.
No comments:
Post a Comment