That's about the only conclusion I can come to with the recent New York Times article about President Trump's tax returns. They say the returns were provided by someone authorized to have them, but that doesn't change the fact that if the person is in government, releasing them without proper cause is a felony, and even if the person is outside the government, it's generally a crime. Certainly H&R Block would reconsider an employee's employment status if they found out an employee was shopping such information around, and notify authorities.
It strikes me here that it's very interesting that the media couldn't talk with people who knew Barack Obama in college, or find an indication of what his grades might have been at that time, but they can induce people (perhaps Michael Cohen?) to break the law to release Trump's tax returns.
Can't exactly say they're not biased, can we?
Know Your Lifts: The Romanian Deadlift (RDL)
-
In the Know Your Lifts series, we’ve covered the high-bar back squat, the
low-bar squat, the power jerk and split jerk, and the overhead press. It’s
been...
12 hours ago
2 comments:
They are basically setting the guy up for re-election and are too dumb to see it because of the bubble they live in and the liberal lenses through which they see everything.
Liberals ruin everything. Even the innocence of Frog and Toad, LOL.
True. One of my favorite comments on the Senate election of 2018 is that the treatment of Brett Kavanaugh all but ensured the loss of key Democrats who could have otherwise secured a stronger position for that party in the Senate. Hopefully 2020 will be the same--I would hate to see an electoral reward for a party that voted monolithically to preserve the legality of infanticide, to put it mildly.
Post a Comment