Say what? Well, it strikes me that one of the most dangerous things many people in #MeToo are doing is to say #IBelieveYou. How so?
Well, it introduces a presumption of guilt and an absolutism that is really more of a product of faith than of evidence. When this happens, something very dangerous occurs; the question of guilt or innocence becomes unfalsifiable. The trouble with this is that if a hypothesis is not falsifiable, it simultaneously cannot be proven, and when unfalsifiable premises like #IBelieveYou are introduced, that reduces a great portion of sexual assault investigations and trials towards a mere popularity contest.
You can see this, really, in the behavior of Democrats who supported Hilliary Clinton, wife of serial philanderer and sexual abuser Bill and head of Bill's "bimbo eruptions" team, but then assume the guilt of Brett Kavanaugh on far flimsier evidence than caused Bill to surrender $850,000 and his law license in a sexual harassment lawsuit. When we say #IBelieveYou, we discard the notions of witness credibility, corroboration, and other evidence.
This also has a very nasty side effect (again, see "Bill Clinton") of empowering the people who are most likely to commit sexual assault while victimizing the best possible allies of abused women. How so? Simple. Those with a narcissistic personality disorder are both "sexually adventurous" and able to manipulate others--a deadly combination enabling them to commit, and get away with, sexual assault.
Those without the disorder are, then, left with little defense when politicians with NPD, like Dianne "Nifong" Feinstein, seek to try them in kangaroo court. Here is a defense lawyer's view on what shows him that accusations are "off" in terms of evidence. Yes, it is precisely what the handlers of accusers like Anita Hill and Christine Blasey Ford are doing. Word to the wise.
Those who would support #MeToo need to come to grips with the fact that #IBelieveYou may be one of the most counter-productive ideas they've come up with, actually making the world more dangerous for women. It's time to replace it with "I'll take you seriously" and restore the primacy of evidence and the legal process to these matters.
Podcast #1047: The Roman Caesars’ Guide to Ruling
-
The Roman caesars were the rulers of the Roman Empire, beginning in 27 BC
with Julius Caesar’s heir Augustus, from whom subsequent caesars took their
nam...
10 hours ago
4 comments:
It is my job as your FRIEND to believe you. Otherwise, "taking your words seriously" is quite reasonable.
But we all want to be everyone's friend, don't we....
Well, it introduces a presumption of guilt and an absolutism that is really more of a product of faith than of evidence. When this happens, something very dangerous occurs; the question of guilt or innocence becomes unfalsifiable. The trouble with this is that if a hypothesis is not falsifiable, it simultaneously cannot be proven, and when unfalsifiable premises like #IBelieveYou are introduced, that reduces a great portion of sexual assault investigations and trials towards a mere popularity contest.
Fancy wording, but yep. I agree completely.
And Hearth is right too. What IS it with everyone going out of their way to try and connect with every other person on the planet (or at least in their trajectory, real or virtual)? Can you say insane?
Another way of describing the result here: tribalism, with all the worst implications of that word. And I don't even think it's my job as someone's friend to believe everything they say--there are times where simple love requires me to say that I'm not buying it.
And I don't even think it's my job as someone's friend to believe everything they say--there are times where simple love requires me to say that I'm not buying it.
Yes and amen!
Post a Comment