My friend Jim has a post about a scandal at First Baptist Church of Hammond, Indiana. Evidently, the head pastor has been found to have bedded a then 16-year-old female member.
Now, despite growing up 25 miles from Hammond (exit 26 on I-94 in Indiana, you can figure it out), I never have entered their building, nor did I have a desire to do so. However, there are a number of things from which we can learn in this sad case if we're willing.
First of all, as Jim points out, it can be very dangerous to have a father and son ministering together--a father will tend to overlook the moral faults of his son, as Jack Hyles is said to have done for both his son and son-in-law. A commenter of Jim's and mine also notes that a similar thing happened at Jim's current church.
On a different level, though, churches that avoid nepotism can fall into the same trap by falling into a cult of personality. Let's take a look at First Baptist since Hyles arrived in 1959.
1. You have a church filled with images of their most famous pastor, including a gaudy bronze of him and his wife.
2. You have a Bible college named after him, also filled with images of Hyles.
3. Hyles persuaded his congregation, with no Biblical or secular evidence, that not only was the King James the "only" Bible, but also that no one could be saved unless the KJV was somehow involved.
4. He kept his Bible college and pastorate despite a string of sexual scandals, many involving his own family.
5. When his son in law took the pastorate, he changed the church away from KJV-only theology simply by announcing that the KJV was not the only Bible out there--nobody apparently challenging him.
6. His son also came up with a theology that argued that when someone comes to Christ, it is a spiritual version of intercourse with Christ.
Now look at #6 carefully; it's very close to, but not, good theology. As Ephesians 5 notes, the Bride is being prepared for wedding to her Lord--not yet wed. She is betrothed, not married. So we have first of all the problem that people stayed despite Schaak's argument--not too many saw through it. And it gives the obvious question; did the young lady come for counseling because of doubt of her salvation, and the pastor volunteered to give her "a little bit of Christ" for her faith's sake? And to how many did he do it? The statistics I've seen indicate that molesters of girls average about eight to ten victims.
No matter what happens with this sordid case, I think we call can agree that if the doctrine of a church--or the positions of any other organization--are grounded in no authority higher than the head of the organization, that organization (church, company, etc..) is in trouble. Pray for the leadership of 1st Baptist, that they will see their need to build their church on the teachings of the Bible, and not simply upon the authority and personality of their leaders. They will then face the daunting task of teaching their members--if they indeed stay--to be good Bereans who will keep their pastors honest.
Undisputed Title
-
The highlight of the entire internet this past week has been Justine
Bateman – best known as “Mallory Keaton” from “Family Ties”, let’s just say
20 years a...
14 hours ago
8 comments:
that they will see their need to build their church on the teachings of the Bible
therein lies yer problem. using the Bible alone doesnt solve anything, or bring unity.
who was built upon the Bible, Calvin's church or Luthers's?
they both built churches upon the Bible, yet saw fit that your kind were dead for doing the same.
Very good point. I think it's when someone claims their interpretation is "right" and has no tolerance or patience with those who may think differently is when problems come up.
I know I have much to learn about the Bible and living life as a Christian - while I sure hope (and believe) I'm heading in the right direction, I've learned much from people who go to churches where I doubt I'd be comfortable attending.
I fully endorse standing for what you believe is Truth - but don't ever be so arrogant to think that you couldn't possibly be wrong.
Tobin; well put. I was merely pointing out that a healthy church cannot be one where the word of the leaders goes without being processed through an outside authority.
Gino....wasn't just Calvinists and Lutherans oppressing Baptists, I seem to remember. Don't need to be a "Trail of Blood" type to remember that.
(which Catholic Church is right; the one that killed Baptists, or the one that merely politely disagrees? Seems that Scripture + the Church doesn't even generate self-consistency)
But seriously, if we have an outside authority, we may not totally avoid the mistakes, but at least we can recognize them later.
Agree about the need for outside authority. It is the reason we need a form of consistory -- an assembly of elders across a region -- to monitor and govern the preaching, to audit (listen) to it and then critique it.
But Calvin and Luther both agreed on that in principle. As did their catholic contemporaries. They just had different ways of dealing with the issue.
The independent congregation is a new and unwelcome development. Every church needs external governance.
Chris--welcome here. (took me a minute to figure out who you were, but now I get it)
Agreed that there can be hazards to the congregational form of church government. That said, I'd note that the biggest hazard--no matter whether church government is congregational, presbyterian, or episcopal--is when people start following a man instead of the Word. One can find that--e.g. our PCUSA, United Methodists, Anglicans here in the USA--with any form of church government, really.
BTW, Gino, are you really going to hold up the Catholics as a historic model of how the church ought to deal with sexual immorality among the clergy? Sorry; while they're thankfully repenting of aiding and abetting priests' sins in this area, it's pretty clear that the outside authority of the bishops all too often worsened the situation.
trust me Bubba, there are many sins among the Catholic leadership, but sins were not the issue of the post as much as false teaching is.
i do not recall a Papal encyclical that called for the death of Baptists, though. or the one that said sexual immorality for clergy was cool...
Gino; what I'm pointing out here is that (a) the Catholics could and did do some terrible things against Protestants in general and Baptists specifically (talk to the Heugenots and Jan Hus) and (b) the episcopal oversight actually tended to worsen issues with the pedophile priests because they tended to move them from place to place instead of terminating them.
Post a Comment