Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed has argued that "bottom surgery" is akin to circumcision. Well, I guess there is a superficial similarity in that tissue is removed from that part of the body, but millions of Jewish (and Muslim, ahem) wives would affirm that the "essential function" of that part of the body is retained with circumcision, and (apart from Lorena Bobbitt types) would generally affirm that they would be more than disappointed if their husbands' circumcisions were replaced by bottom surgery.
Really, it seems to take elite college degrees--and apparently a Rhodes Scholarship in El-Sayed's case--to make a person as catastrophically stupid as El-Sayed. Or perhaps he's being rather nostalgic for the "good old days" of the harem system in the Ottoman Empire, where captive women were sold into sex slavery, and the men from their towns who otherwise would have married them were either killed, or castrated and turned into harem attendants.
Whatever the fact is, El-Sayed does not appear to understand that there are reasons we don't allow minors to make certain permanent decisions, and hence he's (even apart from his anti-Semitism) an extremely poor choice for elective office at any level.