Courtesy of Lew Rockwell, it's a great summary of the basic ethical problems with the current "majority hypothesis" of climatology. In a nutshell, the data are cherry picked, and when someone wants to take a look at how, they get a stiff arm.
In a court of law--at least if it's not in California--any good lawyer would pounce on that like a Rottweiler on a T bone. Unfortunately, the media have largely forgotten how to think, and hence the majority hypothesis is protected.
Hunting for Herbie: How to Find the Bottlenecks Slowing Down Your Life
-
You want to get more things done in life. So you become an early riser, buy
a planner, and download a to-do list app. You maintain inbox zero by
answerin...
8 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment