Courtesy of Lew Rockwell, it's a great summary of the basic ethical problems with the current "majority hypothesis" of climatology. In a nutshell, the data are cherry picked, and when someone wants to take a look at how, they get a stiff arm.
In a court of law--at least if it's not in California--any good lawyer would pounce on that like a Rottweiler on a T bone. Unfortunately, the media have largely forgotten how to think, and hence the majority hypothesis is protected.
Podcast #1,117: How Constraints Help You Focus, Create, and Finish
-
Back in 2019, David Epstein joined me to talk about his book Range and
why generalists often thrive in a specialized world. Now he’s back with a
new bo...
6 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment