Courtesy of Lew Rockwell, it's a great summary of the basic ethical problems with the current "majority hypothesis" of climatology. In a nutshell, the data are cherry picked, and when someone wants to take a look at how, they get a stiff arm.
In a court of law--at least if it's not in California--any good lawyer would pounce on that like a Rottweiler on a T bone. Unfortunately, the media have largely forgotten how to think, and hence the majority hypothesis is protected.
Odds & Ends: March 6, 2026
-
Blood Touching Blood by Derrick Jeter. One of my favorite corners of
American history to read about is the Indian Wars after the Civil War,
particularly ...
14 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment